Repository sample
Start with a bounded private code sample, docs, issue patterns, and expected answers.
- No secrets
- No production credentials
- Fixed tasks
Private code assistant offer note
Use this benchmark before rolling a local AI coding assistant into private repositories. It turns Qwen3-Coder momentum into a measured scope: safe repository samples, secrets boundaries, context budget, editor fit, and RTX 4000 Ada model-fit limits.
Updated 2026-05-31; live local-inference claims remain gated until the actual server passes driver, Ollama, and model smoke tests.
Start with a bounded private code sample, docs, issue patterns, and expected answers.
Test Qwen3-Coder 30B and lighter fallbacks against real repository work before team rollout.
For production teams, code assistant work belongs behind access control, audit scope, and update windows.
These gates turn developer interest into a paid, evidence-based setup instead of an uncontrolled AI experiment.
Choose representative source files, READMEs, architecture notes, and issue examples. Exclude secrets, production data, private keys, tokens, and customer records before the first model run.
Define tasks such as explain a module, locate a bug, draft a patch, update tests, or summarize a pull request. Every task needs an expected answer or review rubric.
Separate read-only answer generation from patch creation. Scope users, API keys, editor access, logs, and review requirements before anyone depends on the assistant.
Commercial rule: sell the benchmark, report, and managed operating scope first. Upgrade public copy to live local code assistant claims only after runtime health and target-model smoke tests pass on the actual host.
Current model pages make private code assistants attractive, but 20 GB VRAM still needs measured limits.
Ollama lists a 30B Qwen3-Coder variant at 19 GB with a large context window. On an RTX 4000 Ada 20 GB system, that makes it a benchmark candidate, not a capacity guarantee.
Qwen3-Coder-Next targets agentic coding and local development with long-context behavior. It stays a watchlist benchmark until quantization, memory, latency, and tool calling work on the target host.
If the 30B path fails memory, latency, or concurrency checks, the useful product is still the benchmark result and a smaller fallback plan for developer workflows.
The deliverable must be useful to a buyer even if the largest local model is not a production fit.
Record driver state, Ollama health, model availability, context target, VRAM behavior, and startup failures.
Run fixed repository questions and compare answers against expected files, symbols, and rationale.
Test small patches only with review gates, test commands, and rollback expectations.
Define access, logs, backups, update windows, user count, and support boundaries.
These sources guide scope language; final claims still depend on the server runtime and the buyer repository.
Use for local model availability, size, and endpoint planning after Ollama health is proven.
Ollama Qwen3-Coder →Use for agentic coding, long-context, and tool-use positioning, then verify locally before promises.
Qwen3-Coder GitHub →Qwen3-Coder blog →Use the official model card and license as planning input before any production repository rollout.
Hugging Face model card →Use NVIDIA specifications as the public hardware boundary, not as an automatic throughput promise.
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada →